Publications
Plan for Capacity Building Using 3D Modeling & Planning Decision Support Systems

Title:
Plan for Capacity Building Using 3D Modeling & Planning Decision Support Systems
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
150
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC), recognizing the value of 3D modeling and Planning Decision Support Systems (PDSS) as well as the challenges involved with implementing these tools, issued an RFP for a “Plan for Capacity Building Using 3D Modeling Applications & Planning Decision Support Systems” for the Prince George’s County Planning Department. The RFP stipulated that the Plan included an in-depth needs assessment of the Department, an evaluation of available tools, and a survey documenting the use of 3D modeling and PDSS tools by other planning departments across the nation. As a resource for other planning agencies, the first half of the report is available for download using the links below. The posted chapters summarize the findings and recommendations of the report (Chapter 1), give an overview of the methodology used (Chapter 2), document the results and findings of the national online survey and agency interviews (Chapter 3), and describe and evaluate many of the leading tools in the industry (as of early 2010, Chapter 4).
Related Documents:
Piscataway Village Rural Conservation Study Part II: Village Design Guidelines

Title:
Piscataway Village Rural Conservation Study Part II: Village Design Guidelines
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
88
This report is the second part of a multiyear study of the rural village of Piscataway. The first part, published in 1991, documented the history of the village, defined its unique character, and proposed design concepts and methods to protect its rural and historic qualities. The purpose of this report is to provide detailed design guidelines to assist the residents of the community in protecting the character of the village. The study was begun in late 1991, and completed in February 1995. This report, as well as the earlier study, was requested by the Historic Preservation Group of the Piscataway Citizens’ Association. The historic Village of Piscataway is located in the southwest portion of Prince George’s County, on Floral Park Road between Livingston Road and Piscataway Road. Of the remaining buildings, the earliest date from the mid-eighteenth century and the most recent from the first half of the twentieth century, all of which retain their significant architectural detail. This report is divided into four primary sections: Background, Historic Preservation in Piscataway, Village Design Guidelines and Conclusions. The report includes a summary of the historical development of Piscataway, an analysis of the village’s existing character, and an overview of existing development regulations and recent development proposals. It also includes an examination of existing preservation regulations affecting the village, as well as a building-by-building review of the village’s historic resources. Design Guidelines are provided for general maintenance, rehabilitation, additions, site improvements, new construction and streetscape improvements. The report concludes with a list of additional measures for protecting the character of Piscataway. The report is supplemented with photographs, maps and illustrations.
Related Documents:
Community Center Feasibility Study for the Town of Cottage City

Title:
Community Center Feasibility Study for the Town of Cottage City
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
1616 McCormick Drive,
Largo, MD 20774
Number of Pages:
42
This document is a Community Center Feasibility Study for the Town of Cottage City, a municipality in Prince George’s County, Maryland, incorporated in 1924 (Planning Area 68, Councilmanic District 5). In winter 2023, the Town applied to the Prince George’s County Planning Department’s Planning Assistance to Municipalities and
Communities (PAMC) program to fund a community center study for a recently purchased site. PAMC funding was approved by the Prince George’s County Planning Board on July 27, 2023, and the project kicked off on October 10, 2023. The study analyzes aspects of the site selected by the Town, identifies the Town’s programmatic needs and potential users; provides conceptual site plans and floor plans, and estimates costs for construction and operation. This feasibility study is aligned with and builds on observations, recommendations, policies, and strategies in the 2014 Plan Prince George’s 2035 Approved General Plan and the 2009 Approved Port Towns Sector Plan..
Related Documents:
Piscataway Village Community Vision Process

Title:
Piscataway Village Community Vision Process
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
This document is the third party of a multiyear study of the rural village of Piscataway, located in south Prince George’s County on Floral Park Road between Livingston Road and Piscataway Road. T1 report, published in July 1991, documented the history of the village, defined its unique character proposed design concepts and methods to protect its rural and historic qualities. The second report, put in February 1995, provided detailed architectural design guidelines to assist the residents of the com in protecting the character of the village. The third part of the study continued the previous efforts in : of community visioning workshops with local residents. Through a collaborative approach with parti< the workshops used drawings, photographs, images and charts to develop a consensus about the conm visual and physical qualities. This report documents the community visioning process undertake February to June 1995. This report is divided into seven sections, with each section documenting one of the community vi workshops. A process chart illustrating the chronology of the seven workshops is included in this doc The structure of the workshops was organized around the following broad categories: History and Inv Analysis, Alternatives, Implementation and Next Steps. Each section begins with the meeting minutes j workshop, followed by charts, sketches, maps and diagrams relating to the topics discussed by the we participants. Several workshops focused on identifying and analyzing the physical design features wit village. Topics included village integrity/character, infill development, open space, a "community" center, gateways, landscape setting, streetscape elements and circulation patterns. Other workshop disc concentrated on methods for protection of historic resources, implementation strategies and funding ( Products of the visioning workshops included design guidelines, landscape master plan recommendation< an implementation strategy chart. The letter requesting this work effort from the Piscataway Historic Preservation Group is included document. The project was carried out under the Planning Department's FY 1995 Community Preset and Design Workshops Work Program.
Related Documents:
Oral History Interviews for the African-American Heritage Survey 2008

Title:
Oral History Interviews for the African-American Heritage Survey 2008
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
156
During the 1996 celebration of the county’s Tricentennial, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission published the African-American Heritage Survey. The publication documented 107 historic properties and 14 historic communities of significance to Prince George’s County African-American history and heritage including residences, schools and lodge halls, churches and cemeteries, and urban and rural communities.The interviews are filled with rich detail about day-to-day life in Prince George’s County and will assist in the efforts of many groups to document and perpetuate the county’s African-American heritage for future generations.
Related Documents:
St. Barnabas-Beech Road Industrial Study and Action Plan

Title:
St. Barnabas-Beech Road Industrial Study and Action Plan
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Publication Date:
06/01/2010
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
156
Located just inside the Capital Beltway and south of Branch Avenue (MD 5), the St. Barnabas-Beech Road study area encompasses a strip commercial corridor and a small industrial center flanked by mid-to-late twentieth century residential and commercial development. As with many of the county’s post-World War II commercial areas, new investment has moved away from St. Barnabas Road to farther-out suburbs, leaving behind obsolete commercial buildings, older infrastructure, and a corridor designed primarily for automobiles. The Beech Road industrial area has fared somewhat better since its development in the 1950s, but the proximity of residential development and the southern barrier of Henson Creek and the Capital Beltway has limited the expansion of industrial uses. Many of the industrial area properties also contain older structures, and its public infrastructure shows signs of deterioration. Additionally, development standards of previous decades have created an area with minimal landscaping and screening of operations areas.
Related Documents:
Sears, Roebuck and Company Mail-Order House Survey

Title:
Sears, Roebuck and Company Mail-Order House Survey
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Publication Date:
04/01/1988
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
1616 McCormick Drive
Largo, MD 20774
Number of Pages:
116
From October 1, 1986 through September 30, 1987, the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation staff conducted a field survey of Sears, Roebuck and Company mail-order houses in the County. The Sears, Roebuck mail-order house survey and a companion study of Victorian pattern book houses in Prince George’s County were comp orients of ongoing research projects of the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Commission, implemented by the Planning Department of M-NCPPC with a matching grant from the Certified Local Government program of the Maryland Historical Trust. This survey of Sears mail-order houses was conducted with the advice and ongoing involvement of Raymond W. Bellamy, Jr., Cheverly Town Historian and Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Commissioner from September 1986 through January 1989. Mr. Bellamy became knowledgeable about Sears mail-order houses through his study of the 25 models constructed in the Town of Cheverly. His extensive research on those structures is incorporated into this report. I would like to acknowledge his help and thank him for his assistance on this project. Thanks also goes to the many Sears mail-order house owners who supplied information on their houses for this study, and to members of the Prince George’s County Historical Society who “found” and reported on Sears houses in the County for this study. The eighty-two Sears mail-order houses identified during this survey are not the total number of Sears houses standing in the County. More have been identified since this study’s completion. Identification and cataloging of Sears and other mail-order houses in the County will be an ongoing project of the Historic Preservation Commission. Some original drawings and text in this report are from Houses by Mail, by Katherine Cole Stevenson and H. Ward Jandl. These include pages 30, 34, 39, 42, 43, 45, 47, 49, 54, 56, 60, 64, 67, 70, 72, 74, 76, 77, 79, 83, 89, 91, 93, 95, 100, 102, 104, 105, 107, 109 and 111 of this study. These pages are reproduced with the permission of the Preservation Press of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Prints of the above pages can be ordered from the Preservation Press at a cost of $10 for each print. Contact Chris O’Neil at (202) 673-4057.
Related Documents:
Sand and Gravel Mining in Prince George's County Past, Present, and Future

Title:
Sand and Gravel Mining in Prince George's County Past, Present, and Future
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Publication Date:
07/01/2020
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
108
The Community Planning Division of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Prince George’s County Planning Department, conducted this study in response to an inquiry by the Prince George’s County Council on the status of the sand and gravel extraction industry and opportunities for adaptive reuse of closed sand and gravel mines. This report reflects information collected in literature searches, a geographic information system (GIS) survey of sand and gravel extraction sites, site visits to operating and closed sand and gravel mines, and interviews of state, County, and mining industry officials. This study describes sand and gravel mining in Prince George’s County and its impacts, and makes recommendations for its future, including how closed sand and gravel mines may be reused.
Related Documents:
Rural Historic Landscapes and Scenic Roads Study (Subregion VI)

Title:
Rural Historic Landscapes and Scenic Roads Study (Subregion VI)
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Publication Date:
12/01/1988
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
42
Prince George’s County Planning Department engaged Land and Community Associates (LCA) to undertake a model historic landscape and scenic road study. The purpose of this study is to analyze one rural historic landscape and one scenic road segment, identifying significant characteristics and the threats to them through a model that can be used for further evaluation and protection of historic rural resources throughout the County. This project was not intended to be a comprehensive study of all potential rural historic landscapes and scenic roads, but rather a model of how to undertake such analysis and a prototype to help better understand land use and scenic road issues.
2001 Riverdale Park Architectural Survey

Title:
2001 Riverdale Park Architectural Survey
Author:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Prince George's County Planning Department
Publication Date:
01/01/2001
Source of Copies:
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive
Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Number of Pages:
118
This survey report was completed at the request of the Town of Riverdale Park under the Planning Assistance to Municipalities and Communities Program. The purpose of the survey was to collect general data about the architectural and historical character of the original 1889 Riverdale Park subdivision and a smaller adjacent subdivision platted in 1906 as West Riverdale. This report updates a similar survey completed in 1991. This report is designed to provide preliminary findings about the potential eligibility of the study area for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as a Historic District and for potential designation as a Historic District under the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Ordinance. The report contains general historical background information, a description of research methodology, a set of findings about the architectural character of the study area, recommendations on eligibility for historic district designation, and potential actions to follow this report. The report’s appendices include a detailed building inventory, a glossary of building forms and styles, and local, state and federal historic preservation policies and guidelines. The report is illustrated with maps and photographs.